Suggestions about burn and reflection

  1. The second-ranked address holds 59q, accounting for 14.17% of the total. But except for the coins that have been burned, it accounts for 28% of the remaining amount, which is too high, and I think the development team should burn a part of it

  2. The top 20 addresses hold 82% of the total, which means that 82% of the reflection points are given to the top 20. Except for the first two addresses, most of the others are exchanges. Exchanges have swallowed these reflections and can directly sell these cost-free coins. This behavior has been driving down the currency price, which is unfair to all other currency holders . I think reflection should be canceled, or like eth, a pledge mechanism should be established, and only users who participate in the pledge can get reflection

  3. The tax rate can be reduced, but the burns should be kept, which is a guarantee of deflation

The content was translated by google

1.排名第二的地址持有的数量为59q,占总数的14.17%。但是除过已经燃烧的币,它占剩余数量的28%,这个占比太高了,我认为开发组应该烧掉一部分

2.前20地址持有总量的82%,意味着有82%的反射分给了前20。除过前两个地址,其他大部分为交易所,交易所侵吞了这些反射,并可以直接出售这些无成本的币,这种行为一直在压低币价,这对其他所有持币者都不公平。我认为应该取消反射,或者像eth一样,建立一个质押机制,只有参与质押的用户才可以获得反射

3.可以降低税率,但燃烧应该保留,这是通缩的保证

1 Like